|
Regarding absolute addressNext Thread | Thread List | Previous Thread Start a Thread | Settings | Details | Message |
|---|
Read-Only Author bagavathy kumar Posted 31-Jul-2006 14:19 GMT Toolset C51 |  Regarding absolute address bagavathy kumar Question: i want to place my fn()1 in xdata 0x0100 is it possible by absolute address? | | Read-Only Author Reinhard Keil Posted 31-Jul-2006 15:45 GMT Toolset C51 |  RE: Regarding absolute address Reinhard Keil http://www.keil.com/support/docs/359.htm | | Read-Only Author Andy Neil Posted 14-Aug-2006 13:08 GMT Toolset C51 |  RE: Regarding absolute address Andy Neil "i want to place my fn()1 in xdata" What exactly do you mean by "fn()1"?? Note that the 8051 architecture can only ever execute from CODE space - it cannot execute anything stored in XDATA! | | Read-Only Author Gary Lynch Posted 15-Aug-2006 18:59 GMT Toolset C51 |  RE: Regarding absolute address Gary Lynch In olden days, most 8051s MCUs kept their xdata and code space off-chip. You could then OR the PSEN\ and RD\ signals together, causing the xdata and code spaces to overlap. This totally defeats the advantages of selecting a Harvard architecture in the first place, and I would guess nobody uses those pre-historic processors anymore, anyway. | | Read-Only Author Hans-Bernhard Broeker Posted 15-Aug-2006 19:38 GMT Toolset C51 |  RE: Regarding absolute address Hans-Bernhard Broeker would guess nobody uses those pre-historic processors anymore, anyway. Wrong on two counts. First, there's nothing pre-historic about 8051s with external memory. A CPU like the DS80C390 is by no means pre-historic. It's certainly unusual for an 8051, but it's quite current. They even still do mask revisions. Second, your guess is wrong. Even processors very much like the original '51s are still used, even today. You try to find a rad-hard 8051 with internal memory, you'll know why. | | Read-Only Author erik malund Posted 16-Aug-2006 14:23 GMT Toolset C51 |  RE: Regarding absolute address erik malund Hans-Bernhard: an old saying goes: "it takes an exception to confirm a rule", so your post "wrong!" actiually confirms that Gary is right :) Erik | |
Next Thread | Thread List | Previous Thread Start a Thread | Settings |
|