 | Discussion Forum |  |
|
|
TCP/IP Memory FootprintNext Thread | Thread List | Previous Thread Start a Thread | Settings | Details | Message |
|---|
Read-Only Author Ryan Brown Posted 16-Feb-2007 22:31 GMT Toolset ARM |  TCP/IP Memory Footprint Ryan Brown How big is the TCP/IP implementation in the RL-ARM RealView® Real-Time Library? http://www.keil.com/arm/rl-arm/ 500 bytes is not a realistic RAM footprint for TCP/IP. My company is currently deciding on whether to implement ethernet. Any help would be appreciated. | | Read-Only Author Reinhard Keil Posted 18-Feb-2007 11:32 GMT Toolset ARM |  RE: TCP/IP Memory Footprint Reinhard Keil It is quite hard to give all the size requirements for the indivitual components (since there are so many). Instead we have measured the applications. Please see: http://www.keil.com/forum/docs/thread7940.asp More information also on: http://www.keil.com/support/docs/3207.htm | | Read-Only Author Ryan Brown Posted 18-Feb-2007 21:32 GMT Toolset ARM |  RE: TCP/IP Memory Footprint Ryan Brown That helps, but what about the code that actually runs the TCP/IP stack, as in ethernet? The second article looks like we can get the IP communucation RAM usage down to 4KB? We just need to communicate via IP and a small FTP server, which I assume would be: TFTP Server 20,016 Bytes ROM 24,312 Bytes RAM + the 4KB minimum. Is this correct? Thanks for any help in advance! | |
Next Thread | Thread List | Previous Thread Start a Thread | Settings |
|