Makefile and IDE build produce different target

Next Thread | Thread List | Previous Thread Start a Thread | Settings

Details	Message
Read-Only Author Doug Moore Posted 19-Jan-2005 20:38 GMT Toolset C166	Makefile and IDE build produce different target Doug Moore I have written a parser to extract the amake dependencies from the final output file. I then use it with nmake to build the same source presumably in the same order since the same .lnp file is passed to the linker in the make file as is generated by the ide. The makefile build works but the target output file is different. Are there any optimizations or other issues which may be bypassed when the IDE is not used for the build?
Read-Only Author Doug Moore Posted 19-Jan-2005 23:16 GMT Toolset C166	RE: Makefile and IDE build produce different target Doug Moore I've traced it down to the fact that c166 alters the behavior somehow depending on whether the path specified for the input module is relative or absolute. I renamed ad.c to be sure the make was accessing the same file independent of the absolute and relative path, and it was. I also used an inline file like c166 @cflags.tmp to see if it might be caused by a lack of space in the environment for the longer paths but it made no difference. This command line produces the code sizes as shown in the listing below: c:\keil\c166\bin\c166 "..\CFiles\Ad.c" HLARGE INCDIR(c:\dev\c167\lx100_m_2_3_9\HFiles;c:\keil\c166\inc) DEBUG CODE PRINT(c:\dev\c167\lx100_m_2_3_9\LFiles\Ad.lst) OBJECT(c:\dev\c167\lx100_m_2_3_9\OFiles\Ad.obj) CODE SIZE = 2002 -------- NEAR-CONST SIZE = -------- -------- FAR-CONST SIZE = -------- -------- HUGE-CONST SIZE = 50 -------- XHUGE-CONST SIZE = -------- -------- NEAR-DATA SIZE = 10 -------- FAR-DATA SIZE = -------- -------- XHUGE-DATA SIZE = -------- -------- IDATA-DATA SIZE = -------- -------- SDATA-DATA SIZE = -------- -------- BDATA-DATA SIZE = -------- -------- HUGE-DATA SIZE = 672 -------- BIT SIZE = -------- -------- INIT'L SIZE = 6 -------- This command line produces the code sizes as shown in the listing below: c:\keil\c166\bin\c166 "c:\dev\c167\lx100_m_2_3_9\CFiles\Ad.c" HLARGE INCDIR(c:\dev\c167\lx100_m_2_3_9\HFiles;c:\keil\c166\inc) DEBUG CODE PRINT(c:\dev\c167\lx100_m_2_3_9\LFiles\Ad.lst) OBJECT(c:\dev\c167\lx100_m_2_3_9\OFiles\Ad.obj) CODE SIZE = 2002 -------- NEAR-CONST SIZE = -------- -------- FAR-CONST SIZE = -------- -------- HUGE-CONST SIZE = 73 -------- XHUGE-CONST SIZE = -------- -------- NEAR-DATA SIZE = 10 -------- FAR-DATA SIZE = -------- -------- XHUGE-DATA SIZE = -------- -------- IDATA-DATA SIZE = -------- -------- SDATA-DATA SIZE = -------- -------- BDATA-DATA SIZE = -------- -------- HUGE-DATA SIZE = 672 -------- BIT SIZE = -------- -------- INIT'L SIZE = 6 --------
Read-Only Author Doug Moore Posted 19-Jan-2005 23:27 GMT Toolset C166	RE: Makefile and IDE build produce different target Doug Moore Well, after some inspection and talking to someone else, it occurs to me that some of the modules use the __FILE__ predefined macro, so the whole path is probably being stored in the const section in one case, and the relative path in the other case. Doh.
Read-Only Author Andrew Neil Posted 20-Jan-2005 00:03 GMT Toolset C166	RE: Makefile and IDE build produce different target Andrew Neil and, if you also use the __LINE__ predefined macro, you will find that making changes to just your comments can affect the generated executable for exactly the same reason...!

Next Thread | Thread List | Previous Thread Start a Thread | Settings